1. Critique of Understanding and Mastery: Student evaluates classmate’s application strategy and understanding of the case and theoretical models.
2. Evaluation of Perspective and Breadth: Student evaluates classmate’s perspective and breadth of case analysis.
3. Arguments, Assumptions, Bias, and Evidence: The student evaluates classmate’s assumptions for their arguments. Here is what the student’s assignment was so you know the background: BHIS 525 – Social and Organizational Issues in Health Informatics Read the following chapter in this eBook: Friedman CP, Wyatt JC. Determining what to study. In: K. J. Hannah, M. Ball MJ, editors. Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics, 2nd edition (pp.48-84). New York: Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com.proxy.cc.uic.edu/book/10.1007%2F0-387-30677-3 Read the following required articles: Ammenwerth, E., Grber, S., Herrmann, G., Brkle, T., & Knig, J. (2003). Evaluation of health information systemsproblems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 71(2), 125-135.
Retrieved from http://proxy.cc.uic.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138650560300131X Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., & Vedel, I. (2011). The IT productivity paradox in health: A stakeholder’s perspective. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(2), 102-115.
Retrieved from http://proxy.cc.uic.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505610002248 Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386-398.
Retrieved from http://proxy.cc.uic.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505607001608 Yusof, M. M. (2015). A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(7), 486-499.
Retrieved from http://proxy.cc.uic.edu/login?url=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505615000611 THEN ANSWER THE QUESTION BELOW : In this course, you have been introduced to two case studies in HIT: Unit Five: Case 3. Albert K, Gupta N, Mason T, Mehta P. In Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Einbinder J, McPhee W,Einbinder L, editors. Transforming health care through information. New York: Springer; 2010. p 29 – 45. Unit Six: Case 8. Hoot NR, Sanders DL. In: Lorenzi NM, Ash JS, Einbinder J, McPhee W, Einbinder L, editors. Transforming health care through information, 2nd edition. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2005. p 81 – 91. From among these two cases, pick whichever case you would like to further critically assess. Think about the case you choose using the HOT-fit framework. Now explore in writing each of the dimensions as a way of framing an evaluation of the HIT for that case (directly if they have been introduced in the case, hypothetically if they are not documented in the case). Refer back to Figure 3 p389 and Table 1 p390 for the dimensions to which I am referring. While Yusof et al. is the primary article for HOT-fit, Ammenwerth et al. and Lapointe provide important conceptual frameworks to help you expand your critical thinking. The Friedman and Wyatt chapter will also help you with your critical thinking about evaluation of the case.
GET THIS PAPER OR A SIMILAR PAPER WITH SUBMIT YOUR HOMEWORKS AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
1. Critique of Understanding and Mastery: Student evaluates classmate’s application strategy and und was first posted on July 1, 2020 at 7:07 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at email@example.com